Study of the Evaluation of Anti-Corrosion Performance of Galvanized Materials by Different Corrosion Test Methods

JIN Quan-jun, LIANG Tao, LV Ling-fang, ZHANG Han-jie, WANG Yao

doi:10.16577/j.issn.1001-1560.2023.0034

Today is Email Alert　 RSS

Materials Protection >

2023 , Vol. 56 >Issue 2: 51 - 56

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16577/j.issn.1001-1560.2023.0034

Study of the Evaluation of Anti-Corrosion Performance of Galvanized Materials by Different Corrosion Test Methods

Expand

Zhejiang Geely New Energy Commercial Vehicle Groud Co.Ltd.，Hangzhou 311228，China

Received date: 2022-08-19

Revised date: 2022-09-16

Accepted date: 2022-10-15

Online published: 2023-08-11

Fold

Abstract

In this paper，the differences between neutral salt spray test and cyclic tests (including GM GMW 14872，Volkswagen PV1210，JASO M610) in the evaluation of corrosion effect of bare sheet and galvanized sheet were analyzed，and the effects of different accelerated corrosion tests on the corrosion morphology and corrosion mark expansion value of different coating materials were determined.By comparing and analyzing the evaluation results of the corrosion resistance of several coating materials obtained by different corrosion test methods，it could be found that the macroscopic morphology of paint damage in salt spray test and the above-mentioined cyclic tests presented as follows: GA board was the best，followed by GI board，and CR board was the worst.For the neutral salt spray test，the expansion value of single side erosion mark of GI board was the largest，followed by that of GA board，and CR board had the smallest value.For the JASO M610 and PV1210 cyclic corrosion tests，that value of GI board was the largest，followed by CR board，and GA board had the smallest value.For the GMW14872 cycle test，that value of GA board was the smallest，followed by GI board，and CR board had the largest value.

Key words： neutral salt spray test; cyclic corrosion test; galvanized sheet; galvanized Zn-Fe alloy sheet; cold-rolled sheet; corrosion morphology; erosion mark expansion value

Cite this article

JIN Quan-jun, LIANG Tao, LV Ling-fang, ZHANG Han-jie, WANG Yao . Study of the Evaluation of Anti-Corrosion Performance of Galvanized Materials by Different Corrosion Test Methods[J]. Materials Protection, 2023 , 56(2) : 51 -56 . DOI: 10.16577/j.issn.1001-1560.2023.0034

References

[1] 高瑾，米琪.防腐蚀涂料与涂装[M].北京:中国石化出版社，2007.GAO J，MI Q.The Anticorrosive Coatings and Painting[M].Beijing:China Petrochemical Press，2007.

[2] 潘应君，张恒，刘静.材料环境学[M].北京:冶金工业出版社，2004.PAN Y J，ZHANG H，LIU J.Environmental Science of Materials[M].Beijing:Metallurgy Industry Press，2004.

[3] ISO 9227-2012，Corrosion Tests in Artificial Atmospheres—Salt Spray Tests[S].

[4] GMW 14872-2013，Cyclic Corrosion Laboratory Tests[S].

[5] PV 1210-2010，Body and Add-on Parts Corrosion Tests[S].

[6] JASO M610-1992，Cosmetic Corrosion Tests Method for Automotive Parts[S].

[7] 宁丽君，杜爱玲，许立坤，等.镀锌层在NaCl 溶液中的腐蚀行为研究[J].腐蚀科学与防护技术，2012，24(4):291-295.NING L J，DU A L，XU L K，et al.Corrosion Behavior of Galvanized Steel in NaCl Solution[J].Corrosion Science and Protection Technology，2012，24(4):291-295.

[8] 王胜民，赵晓军，党建伟，等.批量热镀锌工艺机理的研究现状[J].表面技术，2016，45(5): 19-25.WANG S M，ZHAO X J，DANG J W，et al.Research Status of the Process Mechanism of Batch Hot-dip Galvanizing[J].Surface Technology，2016，45(5): 19-25.

[9] 冯利军，董鹏飞，程正冲，等.镀锌板在不同加速腐蚀环境下的腐蚀行为研究[J].表面技术，2017，46(8):246-253.FENG L J，DONG P F，CHENG Z C，et al.Corrosion Behavior of Galvanized Sheet in Different Accelerated Corrosion Environment [J].Surface Technology，2017，46 (8):246-253.

Options

Outlines

〈

〉

模态框（Modal）标题

Abstract

Cite this article

References