Email Alert  RSS
工艺探讨

42CrMo钢表面激光淬火硬化试验研究

展开
  • 1. 南华大学机械工程学院,湖南 衡阳 421001;2. 衡阳中钢衡重设备有限公司,湖南 衡阳 421000
樊湘芳(1963-),教授,研究方向为金属材料表面改性,电话:17773435311,E - mail:hefanyibang@163.com

收稿日期: 2022-01-28

  修回日期: 2022-03-01

  录用日期: 2022-03-21

  网络出版日期: 2023-12-15

基金资助

衡阳市科学技术发展计划项目(2018KJ170)资助

Experimental Study on Laser Quenching Hardening of 42CrMo Steel Surface

Expand
  • 1. School of Mechanical Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China;2. Hengyang Zhonggang Hengzhong Equipment Co., Ltd, Hengyang 421000, China

Received date: 2022-01-28

  Revised date: 2022-03-01

  Accepted date: 2022-03-21

  Online published: 2023-12-15

摘要

采用RFL - C3300光纤激光器对42CrMo钢表面进行激光淬火处理,通过扫描电镜、光学显微镜、体视显微镜、维氏硬度计及立式万能摩擦磨损试验机进行检测,分析淬硬层组织、硬度、深度、耐磨性与激光工艺参数之间的关系。结果表明:试样经过激光淬火处理后,表层组织得到细化,表面硬度和耐磨性都得到了提升,激光功率为2 200 W,扫描速度为20 mm/s,当光斑尺寸为12 mm×2 mm时,试样表层组织由细小的马氏体组织、少量残余奥氏体和弥散细小碳化物组成,其表面平均硬度达到660 HV2 N,约为基体硬度的2.6倍,摩擦系数稳定在0.4~0.6,比基体降低了25%左右,磨损量为0.5 mg,为基体的23.8%。

本文引用格式

杜成明, 李 勇, 孙 影, 樊湘芳, 朱锦云, 李 胜 . 42CrMo钢表面激光淬火硬化试验研究[J]. 材料保护, 2022 , 55(7) : 160 -164 . DOI: 10.16577/j.issn.1001-1560.2022.0198

Abstract

The laser quenching treatment of 42CrMo steel surface was carried out with a RFL - C3300 fiber laser, and the relations between the microstructure, hardness, depth, wear resistance of the hardened layer and the laser process parameters were analyzed by scanning electron microscope, optical microscope, stereomicroscope, vickers hardness tester and vertical universal friction and wear tester. Results showed that after laser quenching, the surface microstructure of the sample was refined, and the surface hardness and wear resistance were improved. When the laser power was 2 200 W, the scanning speed was 20 mm/s and the spot size was 12 mm × 2 mm, the surface microstructure of the sample was composed of fine martensites, a small amount of retained austenites and dispersed fine carbides. The average surface hardness reached 660 HV2 N, which was about 2.6 times that of the matrix. The friction coefficient stabilized at 0.4~0.6, which was about 25% lower than that of the matrix. The wear amount was 0.5 mg, which was 23.8% of that of the matrix.
文章导航

/