Email Alert  RSS
试验研究

含砂热油管道温度与流速双耦合流态冲蚀规律对比分析

展开
  • 1辽宁石油化工大学石油天然气工程学院; 2宁波工程学院机械与汽车工程学院
杜胜男(1984-),博士,讲师,主要从事油气储运管道输送研究,E-mail: dusn808@163.com

收稿日期: 2023-03-24

  修回日期: 2023-04-12

  录用日期: 2023-05-20

  网络出版日期: 2023-10-15

基金资助

辽宁省教育厅科学研究项目“天然气管道仿生非光滑壁面减阻技术研究”(L2020027)资助

Comparative Analysis of Temperature and Velocity Dual-Coupled Flow Pattern Erosion Law in Sandy Hot Oil Pipelines

Expand
  • (1.School of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering, Liaoning Petrochemical University, Fushun 113001, China;2.School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Ningbo University of Engineering, Ningbo 315211, China)

Received date: 2023-03-24

  Revised date: 2023-04-12

  Accepted date: 2023-05-20

  Online published: 2023-10-15

摘要

为研究集输管道中含砂稠油与低黏原油对弯管内壁的冲蚀规律,通过优化的离散相(DPM)冲蚀模型及管道薄壁传热结构,对含砂稠油与低黏原油在温度与流速耦合作用下的流动过程进行模拟。 结果表明:在相同流速下,稠油的冲蚀速率随温度变化的规律与其自身雷诺数的变化趋势一致,且冲蚀区域随温度升高会不断扩大;低黏原油的冲蚀速率随温度的变化易受流态影响,其冲蚀速率在过渡区会出现明显的波动过程,但冲蚀区域面积变化不明显。 在流速增加的情况下,低黏原油在湍流区的冲蚀速率增长幅度明显大于稠油,且油温越低,低黏原油的冲蚀速率增幅越大。 在相同的湍流输送状态下,原油冲蚀速率的变化主要受流速的影响,并且油温的降低对弯管处的减蚀作用有限。

本文引用格式

刘宏达, 陈一鸣, 杜胜男, 王卫强 . 含砂热油管道温度与流速双耦合流态冲蚀规律对比分析[J]. 材料保护, 2023 , 56(10) : 139 -146 . DOI: 10.16577/j.issn.1001-1560.2023.0245

Abstract

To investigate the erosion patterns of sandy viscous oil and low-viscosity crude oil in gathering and transportation pipeline on the inner walls of bent pipes, an optimized Discrete Phase Model (DPM) erosion model and a pipeline thin-wall heat transfer structure were employed to simulate the flow process of sandy heavy oil and low-viscosity crude oil based on the coupling effect of temperature and flow rate.Results showed that under the same flow velocity, the change of the viscous oil erosion rate with temperature was consistent with the changing trend of its own Reynolds number,and the erosion area would continue to expand as the temperature increases.The erosion rate of low-viscosity crude oil was easily affected by the flow regime with temperature changes, and its erosion rate would fluctuate significantly in the transition zone, but the erosion zone did not change significantly.As flow velocity escalated, the increase in erosion rate of low viscosity crude oil in the turbulent zone was significantly greater than that of heavy oil, and the lower the oil temperature, the greater the increase in the erosion rate of low-viscosity crude oil.Under the same turbulent transportation state, the change of the crude oil erosion rate was mainly affected by the flow rate, and the reduction of oil temperature had a limited effect on corrosion reduction at elbows.

参考文献

[1] PARSI M, NAJMI K, NAJAFIFARD F, et al.A comprehensive review of solid particle erosion modeling for oil and gas wells and pipelines applications[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2014, 21: 850-873.

[2] 陈 宇,马贵阳.三通管中液固两相流冲蚀磨损的数值模拟[J].机械强度, 2019, 41(2): 499-503.CHEN Y, MA G Y.Erosion’s Numerical simulation on solid particles in liquid-solid two-phase flow of tee pipes[J].Journal of Mechanical Strength, 2019, 41(2): 499-503.

[3] 彭文山,邢少华,曹学文,等.水平弯管含砂分散泡状流冲蚀机理分析[J].表面技术, 2019, 48(4): 237-244.PENG W S, XING S H, CAO X W,et al.Analysis of sand erosion mechanism of horizontal pipe bend under dispersed bubble flow [J].Surface Technology, 2019, 48 (4):237-244.

[4] 王 博,郭海莹,耿孝恒,等.气固混合流对集输管道弯管的冲蚀模拟[J].北京化工大学学报(自然科学版),2020, 47(1): 46-52.WANG B, GUO H Y, GENG X H,et al.Erosion simulation of gas-solid mixed flow in a bent pipe[J].Journal of Beijing University of Chemical Technology (Natural Science),2020, 47(1):46-52.

[5] 丁 矿,朱宏武,张建华,等.直角弯管内液固两相流固体颗粒冲蚀磨损分析[J].油气储运, 2013, 32(3):241-246.DING K,ZHU H W,ZHANG J H,et al.Erosion wear analysis of solid particles in liquid-solid two-phase flow of rightangle bend pipe[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2013, 32(3):241-246.

[6] WU H, LIANG X Y, DENG Z Q.Numerical simulation on typical parts erosion of the oil pressure pipeline[J].Thermal Science, 2013, 17(5): 1 349-1 353.

[7] 邓智强, 梁晓瑜, 吴欢欢.原油输运管路冲蚀影响因素仿真研究[J].中国测试, 2015, 41(5): 116-120.DENG Z Q, LIANG X Y, WU H H.Simulation studies on erosion wear factors of crude oil transport pipelines[J].China Measurement & Test, 2015, 41(5):116-120.

[8] American Petroleum Institute.Recommended practice for design and installation of offshore production platform piping systems: API RP 14E 811-1991[S].[S.l.: s.n.], 1991

[9] SALAMA M M.An alternative to API 14E erosional velocity limits for sand-laden fluids[J].Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 2000, 122(2): 71-77.

[10] MCLAURY B S, SHIRAZI S A, VISWANATHAN V, et al.Distribution of sand particles in horizontal and vertical annular multiphase flow in pipes and the effects on sand erosion[J].Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 2011, 133:1-10.

[11] MOHYALDIN M E, ELKHATIB N, ISMAIL M C.Evaluation of different modelling methods used for erosion prediction[C]/ /NACE International.Proceedings of the NACE Corrosion Shanghai Conference & Expo.[S.l.: s.n.],2011: 1-19.

[12] AL-KHAYAT R H, AL-BAGHDADI M A R S, NEAMA R A, et al.Optimization CFD study of erosion in 3D elbow during transportation of crude oil contaminated with sand particles[J].International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 2018, 7(3): 1 420-1 428.

[13] YA H H, OTHMAN M F, PAO W, et al.Simulation study on impact of fine sand particle to 90 steel elbow in pip[C]/ /AIP Conference Proceedings.[S.l.]: AIP Publishing LLC, 2018, 2035(1): 030003.

[14] YUSOF M A H, ZAKARIA Z, SUPEE A, et al.Prediction of erosion rate in elbows for liquid-solid flow via computational fluid dynamics (CFD)[J].Applications of Modelling and Simulation, 2019, 3(1): 28-38.

[15] 王彦骅,吴玉国,张绍川,等.π 型管的冲刷腐蚀数值模拟[J].表面技术, 2020, 49(12): 259-266.WANG Y H , WU Y G , ZHANG S C , et al.Numerical simulation of erosion prediction in π-shaped tube[J].Surface Technology, 2020, 49(12): 259-266.

[16] 曹学文,张依弛,孙晓阳,等.固体颗粒对T 型盲管弯头结构冲蚀的数值模拟[J].腐蚀与防护, 2021, 42(1):30-35.CAO X W, ZHANG Y C, SUN X Y, et al.Numerical simulation of the erosion characteristics of T-shape blind elbow by solid particles[J].Corrosion & Protection, 2021, 42(1):30-35.

[17] 刘 文.基于校准k-ε 模型的复杂地形流动数值模拟研究[D].北京: 华北电力大学(北京), 2020.LIU W.Numerical simulations of flow over complex terrain based on calibrated k-ε model[D].Beijing: North China Electric Power University (Beijing), 2020.

[18] 戴金跃,张航成,张彦虎,等.梯形凹槽织构摩擦副润滑场低雷诺数k-ε 模型研究[J].江苏科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 32(3): 351-356.DAI J Y, ZHANG H C, ZHNAG Y H, et al.Investigation of LRG k-ε models applied in the analysis of sliding friction pairs with trapezoid grooves[J].Journal of Jiangsu University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition),2018, 32(3): 351-356.

[19] 殷结峰, 高春燕, 高义人.低雷诺数下不同湍流模型和差分格式对典型流场数值模拟预测的影响研究[J].制冷与空调, 2017, 31(5): 453-459.YIN J F, GAO C Y, GAO Y R.Study on the Influence of Different Turbulence Models and Discretization Schemes on the Numerical Simulation of the Typical Flow Field under Low Reynolds Number[J].Refrigeration and Air Conditioning, 2017, 31(5): 453-459.

[20] HENKES R A W M, VAN DER FLUGT FF, HOOGENDOORN C J,et al.Natural-convection flow in a square cavity calculated with low-Reynolds-number turbulence models[J].International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,1991, 34(2): 377-388.

[21] EDWARDS J K, MCLAURY B S, SHIRAZI S A.Supplementing a CFD Code with Erosion Prediction Capabilities[C]/ /ASME:In Proceedings of ASME FEDSM’98:ASME 1998 Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting.Vancouver: [s.n.],1998.

[22] LIN Z, RUAN X D, ZHU Z C, et al.Numerical study of solid particle erosion in a cavity with different wall heights[J].Powder Technology, 2014, 254, 150-159.

[23] 王 欣,赵法军,刘 江,等.稠油比热容导热系数及粘温物性参数变化研究[J].化工科技, 2012, 20(3):10-13.WANG X, ZHAO F J, LIU J,et al.The research of specific heat capacity, thermal conductivity and viscosity-temperature physical property parameters changes for heavy oil[J].Science & Technology in Chemical Industry,2012,20(3):10-13.

[24] 刘晓娟, 李 茂, 谢银伍.稠油管道总传热系数计算及流态的区分[J].油气田地面工程, 2014, 33(10):48-49.LIU X J, LI M, XIE Y W.Calculation of total heat transfer coefficient of heavy oil pipeline and classification of flow patterns[J].Oil-Gas Field Surface Engineering, 2014,33(10):48-49.

文章导航

/